Is Prince Andrew Being Used as a Scapegoat and a Distraction?

Prince Andrew has been under relentless media scrutiny as a result of his relationship with paedophile billionaire Jeffrey Epstein – but what is being done about his other accomplices? Is Prince Andrew being used as a scapegoat to redirect attention from the multitude of powerful and influential people who were also associated with Epstein?

Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein

Prince Andrew has been under relentless media scrutiny as a result of his relationship with now-deceased paedophile billionaire, Jeffrey Epstein. What is being done about Epstein’s other accomplices? Is Prince Andrew being used as a scapegoat to redirect attention from the multitude of powerful and influential people who were also associated with Epstein?

As I covered previously, Epstein’s leaked ‘Little Black Book’ was replete with elite contacts, from Hollywood, the music industry, Wall Street, international finance and multinational dynastic families, such as the Bismark, Rockefeller, Kennedy and Habsburg families, to the Saudi royal family. Why is all the attention being directed towards Prince Andrew?

Prince Charles, the next in the line of succession after Queen Elizabeth II, has openly stated that he wants to reduce the number of royal family members by stripping titles when he becomes King.

Charles allegedly urged Her Majesty to fire Prince Andrew, instead of allowing him to resign. With the agenda out in the open, it seems convenient that Andrew be publicly castigated for his relationship with Epstein.

Is all of the negative attention being piled onto Prince Andrew in order to distract from the wider implications of Epstein’s sordid child exploitation network?

Ghislaine Maxwell Developments

In other Epstein related news, Ghislaine Maxwell is allegedly ready to come out of hiding and says she is ready to testify to the FBI. It is alleged that as Epstein’s girlfriend, Maxwell acted as ‘madame’ and worked tirelessly to hobnob with elites while procuring and grooming underage girls for illegal sex work.

If you want to really go down a deep, dark rabbithole on the disturbing proclivities of the deep state and the intelligence services, have a look at the now-declassified FBI files on ‘The Finders’. You can read all about how, in the 1980s, the CIA covered up a child trafficking network that came about as a result of mind-control experimentation. Yes, you read that right.

With what emerged from The Finders report, one could be forgiven for being sceptical about the FBI handling a case of this nature. Given the amount of kompromat potentially gathered by Epstein and Maxwell, it’s likely that she will emerge from this unscathed.

Robert Maxwell, Ghislaine Maxwell’s father, was a highly influential media mogul in the 1980s. He also met a suspicious death when in 1991, he fell off his yacht the named the Lady Ghislaine, just as his media empire was collapsing. It was ruled a suicide. Robert was given a lavish funeral in Israel, just shy of a state funeral, attended by no fewer than six senior members of Mossad (Thomas 1999, p. 210).

Many spy agencies are known to use kompromat operations to gather blackmail material on influential people. How else are their handlers supposed to ensure they keep the secrets they’re entrusted with, when they are allowed into the upper echelons of society?

So, what do you think? Is Prince Andrew being used as a scapegoat to take the heat off Epstein’s other associates? The bigger question is, now that we know what these sickos are up to behind closed doors, what is going to be done about it?

Reference:

Thomas, Gordon 1999, Gideon’s Spies: The Secret History of the Mossad, St. Martin’s Press, New York.

Site Managed by ManageWP® Australia