Fuck sake,who is Malcolm ?

Hahahahahahahaaha.”Malcolm” ? Wow,what a spectacularly incorrect judgemental backwards vagina you really are. Is that your kid in the picture ,or just someone you’re molesting? Now fuck away off Rectal McCock. Have an eppy.

You really are an ugly person, Malcolm, both inside and out. And as for “sucking rectal”, that’s YOUR fixation, not mine. I’m sure you enjoy it, but it’s not my particular kink.

No,it ‘s you that sucks Rectal me dear old slapper. You’re just a nasty withered old shrew who believes that some people have no right to their own opinions if they conflict with yours. Now fuck away off there’s a good Sheila.

I don’t consider sexual activity between consenting adults to be any of my farking business. I guess that is really where we differ, Malcolm.

“Unless they’re straight, in which case, you’re more than happy to sell them condoms, lube, whatever, even if they aren’t married.”
Did I say any such thing? I consider that unchastity in heterosexuals has produced far more social evils than homosexual activity. But you don’t fix the problem by defining a non-marriage as a marriage, and calling a same-sex union a marriage is the same as passing a law saying that two nuts or two screws can form a bolt.
It should also be noted that, throughout history, a large proportion of the population has been unable to marry – through mental disorder (such as this), physical illness, religious vocation, poverty, family responsibility, geographic isolation, or simply being unlucky in love. As I belonged to the last category for my first 50 years, I do not regard chastity as a difficult virtue.
However, it is my observation that the current campaign for homosexuality is part of a much bigger campaign: that of total sexual licence. Are you prepared to disabuse me of that view? Can you list any sexual activity between consenting adults which meets your disapproval?

Ah, but YOU do not want them to MARRY, and don’t want to even sell them a wedding cake if they DO. What you have said has absolutely no bearing whatsoever on the issue, here. People can choose to be chaste until they marry, but you want to prevent them from marrying, thereby forcing them to be chaste their entire lives. Unless they’re straight, in which case, you’re more than happy to sell them condoms, lube, whatever, even if they aren’t married. Stop prevaricating. What you want to do is to legally be allowed to discriminate against people for their sexual identities.

Once more, you are confusing temptation with behaviour. People do not choose to “be” straight, be they do choose to be chaste ie not have sex with anyone except their lawful wedded spouse. I can’t see why gays are not capable of the same self-control.

When did you CHOOSE to be straight?? I didn’t. I did not have a choice in whether I found men or women sexually attractive. Stop promoting your inane belief that gays “choose” to be gay. Your argument is nonsensical and the rest of the world knows it.

So, very interesting.