Politicalpostingmumma Under Fire for Exposing LGBT Youth Group

Facebook blogger Politicialpostingmumma Marijke Rancie who is Melbourne mother who campaigns against the Safe Schools program and fronted both television and print advertisements for the Coalition for Marriage during the postal survey has exposed the risqué activities of several high-profile members of the Melbourne based LGBT youth organisation Minus 18.

Minus 18 was an initial sponsor of the Safe Schools program and its website previously had links to explicit sexual content but following close scrutiny the website was cleaned up. However, its booklets which include gender transition advice to minors remain available by request and its provocative anti-homophobia posters are still displayed in many Victorian schools.

Yesterday on her Facebook page Rancie posted photos which showed two of Minus 18’s organisers engaged in what many would conclude is sexually suggestive conduct. Rancie questioned how the availability of such images are appropriate for a youth worker.

Minus 18 responded with a Facebook post which accused Rancie of violating revenge porn laws and claimed her conduct was the unauthorised release of intimate public images. However, this accusation can be repudiated by the fact that these were publicly available images on the Minus 18 members’ Facebook page. If an image is public how can it be a violation of privacy to post it?

Certainly, if images such as these were discovered to be on the public Facebook profile of certified teacher or social worker that would certainly land them in trouble. People in these professions are actually trained to make sure their Facebook accounts are private and cannot be easily accused by young people under their care. Accusing those critical of such conduct as being homophobic and of bullying vulnerable young people is shrill defence.

Rancie has defended her actions and said she won’t be intimated from her activism against Safe Schools or critiquing Minus 18 due to legal threats. Her Facebook page is regularly trolled and reported by LGBT activists.

Certainly, if LGBT groups want to avoid criticism such as this they should make sure that in regard to their social media accounts they keep them to a standard that would be expected of any working professional, especially if they work with children. It is not anti-LGBT to have this expectation.

 

  • Deplorable!!!

    Round these lgbc perverts up, put them all in sack and throw them in the ocean.

  • ausrockster

    enough of this screeching hag and her faux outrage, KIds these days are one mouse click away from watching a gang bang so her argument about wanting to protect children from Sex Education in school is bullshit. She is a con artist and her and her followers will be poorly judged by history and shame on her for sharing pics of others without consent, she’s is a hypocrite!

    • Karen Dwyer

      You have published a non-sequiteur: “Kids these days… so her argument about wanting to protect her children…’

      It literally makes no sense.

      You have used personal attacks and insults.

      It literally makes you appear malicious.

      Not a good argument for your cause, Comrade!

      • ausrockster
      • Karen Dwyer

        Comrade. I already blocked you. No truth or beauty or love was likely to emanate from your fingertips 🙂

        Ditto any other Comrades: your non-sequiteurs and “projecting” come from a Manifesto that has deceit as its core tenet.

        Blocked, sweeties, blocked.

        • ausrockster

          I can still see you and reply to you Karen, give it another go – sweetie

      • Deplorable!!!

        Hi Mrs Dwyer : )

        • Karen Dwyer

          😉

    • Daniel Indyk

      Your comment is pathetic.PPM is not a hypocrite. And what is bullshit about wanting to shield her kids from so called Comprehensive Sex Education which contains content that she feels is inappropriate for her kids. Doesn’t she have that right? And who died and made you Gd to decide what her kids should learn. Your so totally up ur own back passage that you don’t know which way is up anymore.

  • Mark Casson

    You have to be kidding. This is the same woman who paid to see paedophile apologist Milo Yiannopoulos and promoted him as a person of note. When I point this out to her that Milo was not a person who wanted to protect children from predators she blocked me from posting on her facebook page. She is a thin skinned hypocrite of the highest order. She is not really interested in protecting children , she is only interested in trying to be a minor celebrity by attacking anyone with a progressive viewpoint.

    • Daniel Indyk

      Nope, not kidding. Your comment is completely wrong except for the fact that PPM blocked you. And quite right too… And as far as your ‘progressive’ view point is concerned… well… you might call it progressive…

      • Mark Casson

        So Daniel you think it’s ok to promote a person who protects the identity of a paedophile who may still be molesting children? Your no better than PPM if that’s the case.

        • Daniel Indyk

          Good deflection of questions without answering. Pointless just throwing comments as that is not discussion. Looking at the tone of your discourse that’s all that’s gonna happen. BUT I will answer YOUR question… as i am not like you. I do not believe for 1 minute that Milo is a paedophile. And If you’re accusing ME of being a paedophile then kindly send me your details and you can consider yourself sued. Actually I can find your details… not difficult. Feel free to repeat your accusation as to what i am

          • Mark Casson

            Never said Milo was a paedophile , I said he was an apologist for paedophiles. He is protecting his molesters identity, other victims may be paying the price for his cowardice. You keep backing such behaviour?

          • Daniel Indyk

            Choosing not to reveal who molested him does not make him an apologist for the act. And it is not your place to judge a survivor of molestation. You have no idea whether or not the individual molested others. If he didn’t then it is purely an issue for Milo… if he did then all the other victims are equally guilty and you should be condemning ALL victims who haven’t volunteered information regarding the guilty. Your condemnation of Milo wouldn’t by any remotest chance have anything to do with him being against the left lib progressives, would it? (“you keep backing such behaviour?” is NOT a question. other than a rhetorical one… so i won’t answer). Furthermore… check out the thoughts of Gary Dowsett and Steven Angelidis (major contributors to the safe school program) on paedophiles and paedophelia… interested to see your position on them.

          • Mark Casson

            Actually listen to what he says in the interview , he is an apologists. Also PPM has now had her two cents worth on the Royal Commission into institutional child abuse and has of course backed the religious institution rather than the victims. If you have information on anyone who is molesting children please report them to the police immediately. Milo isn’t a child any more , he isn’t scared to speak out on any subject and insult any person , yet he remains silent. The other victims could still be children , could be mentally ill , could have committed suicide , his silence is disgusting. Your backing of Milo and PPM wouldn’t have anything to do with your being against left leaning progressives?

          • Daniel Indyk

            Why do you assume I haven’t listened to what he says in the interview?… it seems your take on it is different from mine. If ‘I’ have information…??? Are you serious??? Why would I have? I won’t continue discussing with you, and let me tell you why. You do not answer my questions whilst I try to answer yours. That lack of reciprocity will not result in any kind of consensus or agreement… or any compromise. So I will answer your questions now but don’t expect any further responses as, true to form, you’re not going to answer mine. My backing of Milo and PPM has a lot to do with me being against left leaning ‘progressives… you betya! It’s highly likely that Milo wasn’t the only one molested at the age he was molested… so all his contemporary victims are just as guilty as Milo. Disgusting is it? You hypocrite. It’s only becos of Milo’s politics that you are berating him… whereas if you had ANY compassion at all you’d pity him. Now, I’ve treated you in a civil and polite manner up til now in spite of your arrogance… so let’s just leave it at that.

          • Mark Casson

            I have answered your questions , you just seemed to have missed it. Whether some one is left or right they won’t get my backing if they are rotten to the core hypocrites like Milo and PPM. Seems your ideology overrides your moral compass. That is the sort of arrogance that leads to genocide.

          • Daniel Indyk

            you didn’t answer. do i really need to repeat them?… after all you do have a written record… i already told you this is going nowhere due to your failure to discuss… only willing to push your argument. i am really not interested in ‘discussions’ like that. and pls do not talk to me about genocide… it besmirches the true victims of genocide. i politely asked you to refrain but you refuse.

          • Eden_2018

            God you’re a pompous prick!

          • Daniel Indyk

            Thanks for your personal opinion.

      • Mark Casson

        Here is the facts Daniel https://youtu.be/oJhHwspZGcg

  • Paul Thompson

    Well done! The first rule of dealing with a SJW attack Marijke Rancie, is NEVER apologise and NEVER retract. Everyone is entitled to express their opinion, as long as they do so in a non-violent way and don’t violate our laws on Slander or Libel. As long as your comment can be backed with facts, tell them to take you to court or fu*k off.

  • Huddarudda

    You are kidding surely? Seriously, let’s throw out the antics for a second and just digest this. This is a person of note in a position of trust with our youth. As young as 13. And she posts PUBLICLY nude photos of what is being touted as a great piss up party devoid of cops and old school ways. Just try to be a tad impartial. I’m not saying the kids aren’t a click away from porn or the like if the go looking. That’s absolutely true. But that’s nothing like being the person that exposes nudity and promotes what looks and sounds like a full-on “sick and twisted COP Free” party!!!
    So PPM simply re-posts that same photo and makes it clear that this youth worker shouldnt behave like this when promoting. Minus 18. And you tear her to pieces. Call her all manner of crap. I can tell you I wouldn’t want my kids listening or exposed to that kind of parting or nudity at 13 either. That’s all we are saying. Why are You are kidding surely? Seriously, let’s throw out the antics for a second and just digest this. This is a person of note in a position of trust with our youth. As young as 13. And she posts PUBLICLY nude photos of what is being touted as a great piss up party devoid of cops and old school ways. Just try to be a tad impartial. I’m not saying the kids aren’t a click away from porn or the like if the go looking. That’s absolutely true. But that’s nothing like being the person that exposes nudity and promotes what looks and sounds like a full-on “sick and twisted COP Free” party!!!
    So PPM simply re-posts that same photo and makes it clear that this youth worker shouldnt behave like this when promoting. Minus 18. And you tear her to pieces. Call her all manner of crap. I can tell you I wouldn’t want my kids listening or exposed to that kind of parting or nudity at 13 either. That’s all we are saying why are so intent at forcing this on us when we simply want our kids to grow up and they can do all that, discvet all that you so intent on forcing this on us when we simply want our kids to grow up and they can do all that, discover all that in their own time if they want it when they are at least ‘of age’

  • me

    very mentally ill person, one of many currently that has exposed itself running on the shirt tails of the equality pussh

  • Beaumont Miles

    Speaking of paedophile apologists… here’s two profressors from La Trobe University https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8c0eb7ee2ecfd5bdd6221c80aeb9122fa1d017ef2066cf3f2fa6fd403861ec24.jpg

    • ausrockster

      speaking of pedophiles,the final report has just been released online for the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse.
      – 1 in 3 survivors abused at school, of these 71.8% were at religious schools.
      – 58.6% overall sexually abused at institutions managed by religious organizations
      https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/final-report